Fitting into your genes
Some years ago,
I was given the honour of delivering the opening plenary lecture to the First
World Congress of Public Health Nutrition and I had carte blanche as to the
content. I chose to talk about nutrition and genetics and when I finished, I
was set upon by the doyens of the subject to whom the idea that genes could
play a role in such chronic diseases as obesity was verging on sacrilege. The
argument was simple but fundamentally flawed. Obesity rates, they argued, have
rocketed over the last 50 years[1]
during which time the gene pool has remained constant so how could genes be
involved. Recently, I gave a
similar talk to the Polish EU Presidency gig and got the same reaction. So here
is how it happens. Imagine you could take 1000 extremely muscular Maasai
tribesmen from the utterly non-obesogenic Kenyan plains and re-house them with
a decent disposable income in any western city awash with obesogenic
facilities. Some would resist weight gain. Some would show modest weight gain of
which some would do so quickly and others more slowly. Some would become
overweight and obese and do so at different rates. When the experiment is
finished, I would predict a pattern of body weight among the Maasai broadly
similar to the prevailing local pattern.
The evidence
dates back 30 odd years when three seminal papers were published in leading
medical journals. The first used identical and non-identical children and from
this mix it is possible to say what part of obesity is inherited and what part
is due to the environment. The non-identical twins share the same environment
but not the same genome. In the case of identical twins, they share the same
environment and the same genome.
Geneticists have used this model in many areas to separate out the effects of
the environment and the genome. The outcome was that 70%+ of the variation in
obesity was inherited. The next set of data took identical twins that were
overfed for several months and later, underfed for several months. In the
overfeeding phase of 1000 extra calories per day over normal, all subjects
gained weight but to varying degrees. The big variation was between groups of
identical twins. However, among identical twins, here was no variation. If one
gained weight rapidly, so did the other. If one resisted weight gain, so did
the other. And when 1000 calories a day were deducted from their habitual
intake, the same happened. All lost weight but some more than others. And
identical twins shed weight at exactly the same rate. The final study looked at
adoptees and compared their body weights with those of their adopting parents
and those of their biological parents. The correlation was much stronger with
their biological parents.
All of this data
was then buried and forgotten because it was a most inconvenient truth. Even
accepting its truth, those charged with the public health nutrition challenge
of obesity had a further problem. If the average punter got word that their
weight problem was genetic, they would abandon all personal efforts at weight
management, throw their hands in the air and declare “Its not my fault, its my
genes” as they wolfed into some stylish nosh. One has to have considerable
sympathy for this point of view since the struggle to help manage obesity is a
truly hard road. For a while, there was an escape clause in that it was argued
that “that was then and this is now and thirty + years ago we didn’t have the
ubiquitous obesogenic environment of today”. And that was fine until Professor Jane Wardle of University
College London began publishing data on modern twin cohorts followed up over a
long period and with quite detailed lifestyle and diet recorded. Everything
shown 30+ years ago was shown to be still true today. Moreover, Professor
Wardle also showed that the belief that obesity in children has a huge
socio-economic dimension is just not true. Twins of lean parents remained thin
from aged 4 to 11 years irrespective of social class. However, when children
from overweight children were considered, those of low social background did
show accelerated weight gain. Thus social class matters in childhood obesity
but only if filtered by the genes they inherited.
Studying twins
helps us to quantify the true rate of heritability of obesity. It doesn’t tell
us which genes are involved and thus it doesn’t allow us to predict which one
of us will put on weight faster and more easily than others. Now, new
technology allows us look at many hundreds of thousands of points of variation
along the human genome to see where this natural variance is most pronounced in
the obese as opposed to those of us lucky to remain lean. Each point of
variation along a gene is known as an allele and there are certain alleles,
which are much more commonly found among the obese. Thus we are now approaching
the point where we can predict that a certain individual has a strong genetic
tendency toward obesity and maybe, that knowledge could be used to help
children and parents to take preventative measures against obesity. The
converse is also true. We can now conduct simple genetic tests that will
indicate the best calorie reduced diet for individuals to follow in losing
weight. Some will do best by shedding fat calories and other will do best
shedding carbohydrate calories. For some, either route will be equally
effective.
When one
mentions the link between genes and obesity, attention always turns to genetic
variation influencing how energy rich substrates are handled (digested,
transported stored, retrieved, metabolized and so on) in the body. However, this
is simply because the people with the biggest interest in genetic research are
usually biologists. But a genetic tendency to become obese may relate to our
behaviour, our food choice, our satiety, our will power and any one of the many
aspects of our lives that govern food intake. That poses an even greater
challenge to the study of diet and obesity.
As to the
extension of nutrition and genetics to the wider area of personalised
nutrition, take a look at the website of an EU funded project that I am coordinator:
www.food4me.org.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.